Select committee: Health and Social Care Committee

Conclusion 11

Fourth Report - The future of general practice Published 20 Oct 2022 Paragraph 57 Addressed to Department of Health and Social Care
Conclusion (the committee's words)
The Government and NHS England have made a start on reducing the administrative workload in general practice, and it is also encouraging to see some Integrated Care Systems agreeing to try to reduce the amount of work that is inappropriately transferred from secondary care to primary care. However, it is clear that there is still a long way to go to make GP workloads more sustainable.

From: Health and Social Care Committee, Fourth Report - The future of general practice (HC 113), paragraph 57, 20 October 2022

Government response

The government responded to the whole report on 24 July 2023 (deadline 20 December 2022).

Summary written by Accountability Index from the government's response. It is not the government's own words.

The Government welcomes the Committee's report and responds to each recommendation, accepting some, partially accepting most and not accepting others.

  • It accepts recommendations on distributing GP trainees more equitably, receptionist training and simplifying the patient interface across Integrated Care Systems; it also accepts the call for more back-office organisational support for GPs.
  • It "partially accepts" the call for 1,000 more GP training places a year and a four-year scheme: the Long Term Workforce Plan sets an "ambition" to rise from 4,000 to 6,000 places by 2031/32, and there is "no plan to extend GP training beyond three years".
  • It does not accept the recommendations to return to personal lists, to cap list sizes, or to fund PCN continuity leads, saying PCNs and practices are best placed to decide their own workforce and approach.
  • On a national continuity measure it will "consider how best to measure continuity of care" but says it "would not therefore be appropriate to commit to introducing a measure by 2024".

Read the government's response ↗ Report an error