Impact of the Spending Review on health and social care
Closed
What the inquiry looked at
“The scale of the funding challenge in health is colossal and whilst spending on health is increasing, the service is under unprecedented strain and struggling to keep pace with relentlessly rising demand, says the Health Committee in its report on Impact of the Spending Review on health and social care.”
The committee's words, from the inquiry page on parliament.uk ↗.
What it found
We welcome the Five Year Forward View, which sets out the funding challenge facing the NHS over the next five years and, for the first time, a vision for the service to equip it to meet patients’ needs. Last year’s Spending Review aimed to provide the funds to make the Forward View a reality.
The scale of the funding challenge is colossal, especially given the timescale for achieving it. While the NHS has been treated favourably in comparison with other departments, the funding allocated for the NHS in the Spending Review is less than would appear to be the case from official pronouncements. We call on the Government to be clearer in the presentation of its funding commitments. We are concerned that that the shift in resources, especially from public health, health education, transformation and capital budgets, will make it far more difficult to achieve the ambitions set out in the Forward View. In our view, the funding announced in the Spending Review does not meet the Government’s commitment to fund the Five Year Forward View.
There are also new challenges, most notably the rising deficits in NHS providers. The proposed strategies for reducing their costs—cutting the tariffs paid to hospitals, strict pay restraint, imposing agency price caps and reducing capital spending—are not sustainable ways of securing efficiencies in the long term.
The funding designed to pump prime the transformation of services to create better and more efficient services in the future, the Sustainability and Transformation Fund, is being used almost entirely to plug provider deficits, rather than to transform the health and social care system at scale and pace. The transfers from capital to revenue budgets are storing up future costs as well as reducing the funding available for essential transformation of services. We call for the Transformation element of the Fund to be protected to allow the ambitions of the Five Year Forward View to be realised.
The ongoing work to integrate health and social care services, in ways that better meet the needs of patients, shows great promise. But integration and devolution to local areas do not offer quick solutions to the financial problems facing the NHS and social care services. The Transformation fund is essential to get these promising plans off the ground, and we shall be monitoring how it is spent.
Historical cuts to social care funding have now exhausted the capacity for significant further efficiencies in this area. Increasing numbers of people with genuine social care needs are no longer receiving the care they need because of a lack of resource. This not only causes considerable distress to these individuals and their families but results in additional costs to the NHS. We will be monitoring the extent to which the Better Care Fund and Social Care Precept are successful in raising revenue and how this is distributed to reflect need and health inequality. We also note with concern that this funding will not arrive until later in the Spending Review period.
Workforce supply must be improved if we are to meet the future health and social care needs of the population. Most immediately, the Government should review the likely impact of the proposed abolition of NHS bursaries on the supply of nursing staff and other allied health professionals.
What the government said
The government responded on 16 December 2016.
Read the government's response ↗ Read the report ↗ Report an error
How the inquiry ran
Each dot is a dated item listed on this page, from the inquiry's opening on 10 December 2015 to its close on 30 December 2016. Written evidence is not charted: only the latest 50 submissions are listed here.
- Oral evidence 4 sessions
- Report 19 Jul 2016
- Government response 16 Dec 2016
What it recommended 7 recommendations · 23 conclusions
1The financial situation in the NHS has become increasingly tight.
2We have heard compelling evidence that the current payment system does not drive greater efficiency...
3There is no doubt that spending on agency staff on the scale seen since 2009–10...
4We are concerned that the Government has resorted to short-term measures to deal with the...
5The conclusion we draw from the evidence we have heard is that the proposed strategies...
6We are concerned about the effect of reduced access to adult social care as a...
7We recommend that the Government urgently assess and set out publicly the additional costs to...
8Health spending will not increase by as much as expected from official pronouncements.
9Using the original definitions, and taking 2015–16 as the base year, total health spending will...
10We welcome the Five Year Forward View, which provides NHS England’s assessment of the challenge...
11NHS England published further details of where the £22 billion of savings will come from...
12The Department and NHS England now need to set out a detailed plan for realising...
13We are encouraged by the progress that has been made to build on good practice...
14Cuts to social care funding over a number of years have now exhausted the capacity...
15Cuts to public health budgets threaten to undermine key parts of the vision set out...
16Given that even greater responsibility for public health has been transferred to local authorities, monitoring...
17By the time this report is published, a new Prime Minister will have taken office.
18We expect the Government to clarify the situation for CCGs wanting to adopt integrated commissioning...
19We heard some impressive evidence of the work going on to integrate health and social...
20Integration and devolution do not offer a quick solution to the financial problems facing the...
21With much of the upfront investment in the Spending Review being used to plug deficits,...
22The failure to train and retain an adequate supply of clinical staff is causing great...
23We have heard concerns about the potential impact of the proposed abolition of NHS bursaries...
24The Government and NHS England have now produced a clearer account of their intentions for...
25Delivery of the funding commitments the Government has made for mental health is crucial to...
26New models of care and the measures to achieve demand reduction which are crucial to...
27The Forward View needs to be accompanied by strategic thinking from Ministers about what priorities...
28Given the scale of rising demand and costs we are not confident that the efficiency...
29We believe it is time for the Government and NHS England to set out how...
30We expect to return to the subject of the impact of the Government’s spending decisions...
Evidence
Oral evidence sessions 4
- 9 May 2016No witnesses recordedparliament.uk ↗
- 21 Mar 2016No witnesses recordedparliament.uk ↗
- 8 Mar 2016No witnesses recordedparliament.uk ↗
- 23 Feb 2016No witnesses recordedparliament.uk ↗
Written evidence 108 submissions
Listed here by submitter; the evidence itself is on Parliament's website. Showing the latest 50 of 108 recorded submissions. Browse the inquiry on Parliament.
- 20 Jul 2016Sir David DaltonCSR0111
- 5 Jul 2016Voyage CareCSR0100
- 5 Jul 2016Department for Communities and Local GovernmentCSR0109
- 15 Jun 2016Department of Health, NHS England and NHS ImprovementCSR0108
- 9 Jun 2016NHS EnglandCSR0107
- 9 May 2016Somerset CCGCSR0106
- 9 May 2016NHS ImprovementCSR0105
- 9 May 2016The British Psychological SocietyCSR0102
- 9 May 2016Department of HealthCSR0103
- 9 May 2016Health Education EnglandCSR0104
- 20 Apr 2016Local Government AssociationCSR0101
- 12 Apr 2016Regional Asylum Activism ProjectCSR0098
- 12 Apr 2016Terrence Higgins TrustCSR0099
- 7 Apr 2016Institute of Physics and Engineering in MedicineCSR0018
- 9 Mar 2016NHS ProvidersCSR0095
- 9 Mar 2016Royal College of General PractitionersCSR0096
- 9 Mar 2016The Health FoundationCSR0097
- 24 Feb 2016Nuffield Trust (supplementary submission)CSR0092
- 24 Feb 2016Shelford GroupCSR0093
- 24 Feb 2016Professor Andrew StreetCSR0094
- 4 Feb 2016Care & Support Alliance (CSA)CSR0040
- 2 Feb 2016Joint submission: Nuffield Trust, The Health Foundation, The King's FundCSR0091
- 2 Feb 2016The King's FundCSR0090
- 2 Feb 2016County Councils NetworkCSR0089
- 2 Feb 2016Action on Smoking and HealthCSR0088
- 2 Feb 2016techUKCSR0087
- 2 Feb 2016ADASSCSR0086
- 2 Feb 2016Age UKCSR0085
- 2 Feb 2016The Health FoundationCSR0084
- 2 Feb 2016Royal Society for Public HealthCSR0083
- 2 Feb 2016National VoicesCSR0082
- 2 Feb 2016Royal College of NursingCSR0081
- 2 Feb 2016The Disabilities TrustCSR0080
- 2 Feb 2016Terrence Higgins TrustCSR0079
- 2 Feb 2016Carers UKCSR0078
- 2 Feb 2016Cancer Research UKCSR0077
- 2 Feb 2016Inclusion LondonCSR0075
- 2 Feb 2016Turning PointCSR0074
- 2 Feb 2016Cheshire West and Chester CouncilCSR0073
- 2 Feb 2016Optical Confederation and LOCSUCSR0072
- 2 Feb 2016Independent Clinical Services (ICS)CSR0071
- 2 Feb 2016Action on Hearing LossCSR0070
- 2 Feb 2016British Heart FoundationCSR0069
- 2 Feb 2016SenseCSR0068
- 2 Feb 2016ScopeCSR0067
- 2 Feb 2016DimensionsCSR0066
- 2 Feb 2016NHS Clinical Commissioners (NHSCC)CSR0065
- 2 Feb 2016NAT (National AIDS Trust)CSR0064
- 2 Feb 2016British Medical AssociationCSR0063
- 2 Feb 2016Nutricia: Advanced Medical NutritionCSR0062