Select committee inquiry

Primary care inquiry

Closed

Health and Social Care Committee · Opened 28 July 2015 · Closed 30 October 2016

Inquiry on parliament.uk ↗

What the inquiry looked at

“Primary care is the bedrock of the NHS and the setting for ninety per cent of all NHS patient contacts but it is under unprecedented strain and struggling to keep pace with relentlessly rising demand, warns the Health Committee in its report.”

The committee's words, from the inquiry page on parliament.uk ↗.

What it found

In the committee's words, from the summary of 4th Report - Primary care ↗

Primary care is the bedrock of the National Health Service and the setting for ninety percent of all NHS patient contacts. It is highly valued by the public but is under unprecedented strain and struggling to keep pace with relentlessly rising demand. The traditional model of ten minute appointments with general practitioners no longer allows them to provide the best possible care for patients living with increasingly complex long term conditions.

The difficulty in accessing primary care is a serious concern for many patients, especially for those who work during the week. We believe that it is vital that patients have timely access to primary care services. This includes both access to urgent appointments and the ability to book routine appointments in advance.

During the course of this inquiry we heard many examples of innovative practice which give cause for optimism that patients’ access to and experience of primary care can be improved. The priority for government should be to train, develop and retain not only more GPs but wider multi-disciplinary teams working within a more integrated system of care. Patients would also benefit from the better use of technology to assist communication with and between their clinicians. There is a pressing need to improve continuity and safety through the use of electronic patient records which can be shared, with their consent, wherever people access their care.

In line with the recommendations of the Primary Care Workforce Commission, multi-disciplinary teams can harness the skills not only of GPs but physiotherapists, practice nurses, pharmacists, mental health workers and physician associates. We support the Commission’s vision of teams of professionals using their skills to meet the needs of patients much earlier in their journey through the NHS. This would allow GPs to concentrate on those aspects of care that only they can provide. We expect GP leaders to be at the forefront of the development of multi-disciplinary teams.

Patients need more health professionals from a range of disciplines to choose careers in primary care. Existing medical education does not encourage graduates to do so and greater attention must be paid to the needs of patients in designing training pathways and incentives across the entire NHS workforce. It is far from certain that sufficient numbers of GPs and nurses will be available to build new teams and improve patient access. Much greater efforts to recruit, train and retain the primary care workforce will be necessary if the vision of the Primary Care Workforce Commission is to be achieved.

The government made a manifesto commitment to seven day access to services but further clarification is needed about how this commitment is to be implemented and resourced, especially in light of the workforce shortfall.

Improving access to primary care is a welcome goal, but practical application of the seven day policy should be locally designed, led by the evidence and take account of local recruitment challenges. The policy must also focus on the continuity of patient care and avoid reducing the capacity of weekday services as well as urgent out of hours primary care cover.

What the government said

No government response is linked to this report.

How the inquiry ran

Each dot is a dated item listed on this page, from the inquiry's opening on 28 July 2015 to 11 December 2017. Written evidence is not charted: only the latest 50 submissions are listed here.

  1. Oral evidence 5 sessions
  2. Report 21 Apr 2016
  3. Correspondence 2 letters

What it recommended

The committee's recommendations are not listed here yet. Read them in 4th Report - Primary care ↗ on parliament.uk.

Evidence

Oral evidence sessions 5

Written evidence 218 submissions

Listed here by submitter; the evidence itself is on Parliament's website. Showing the latest 50 of 218 recorded submissions. Browse the inquiry on Parliament.

  • 14 Apr 2016Care Quality CommissionPRI0244Full text not held
  • 15 Mar 2016Scrutiny Unit, House of CommonsPRI0243Full text not held
  • 3 Mar 2016Department of HealthPRI0242Full text not held
  • 26 Feb 2016Pharmacy VoicePRI0241Full text not held
  • 26 Jan 2016Elizabeth CecilPRI0240Full text not held
  • 20 Jan 2016Professor Sir Denis Pereira GrayPRI0238Full text not held
  • 19 Jan 2016Sir Donald IrvinePRI0239Full text not held
  • 14 Jan 2016Dr Graham JohnsonPRI0234Full text not held
  • 14 Jan 2016The Medical Protection SocietyPRI0235Full text not held
  • 14 Jan 2016Professor Veronica WilkiePRI0236Full text not held
  • 14 Jan 2016The MDUPRI0237Full text not held
  • 12 Jan 2016Age UKPRI0176Full text not held
  • 12 Jan 2016NHS Castle Point & Rochford CcgPRI0171Full text not held
  • 12 Jan 2016Diabetes UKPRI0166Full text not held
  • 12 Jan 2016Dr Sean HudsonPRI0031Full text not held
  • 12 Jan 2016Dr Ian WhytePRI0069Full text not held
  • 12 Jan 2016Dr Jennifer MartineauPRI0005Full text not held
  • 29 Dec 2015Regional Medical Directorate (South), Nhs EnglandPRI0230Full text not held
  • 16 Dec 2015British Medical Association, supplementary evidencePRI0232Full text not held
  • 16 Dec 2015Royal College of General Practitioners, supplementary evidencePRI0233Full text not held
  • 7 Dec 2015Denplan LimitedPRI0145Full text not held
  • 3 Dec 2015Universities UKPRI0224Full text not held
  • 3 Dec 2015Dr Russell ThorpePRI0225Full text not held
  • 3 Dec 2015Dr Jill WilsonPRI0226Full text not held
  • 3 Dec 2015Professor DrennanPRI0227Full text not held
  • 3 Dec 2015Healthwatch EnglandPRI0228Full text not held
  • 30 Nov 2015Professor Martin RolandPRI0221Full text not held
  • 30 Nov 2015Association Of Surgeons In Primary CarePRI0219Full text not held
  • 18 Nov 2015Devon Local Medical CommitteePRI0222Full text not held
  • 18 Nov 2015UCL Medical SchoolPRI0223Full text not held
  • 3 Nov 2015Royal Pharmaceutical SocietyPRI0199Full text not held
  • 30 Oct 2015Ian BrownPRI0218Full text not held
  • 30 Oct 2015General Medical CouncilPRI0217Full text not held
  • 30 Oct 2015Royal College Of General PractitionersPRI0216Full text not held
  • 30 Oct 2015General Optical CouncilPRI0214Full text not held
  • 25 Sep 2015Essex County CouncilPRI0211Full text not held
  • 25 Sep 2015APP Pharmacy GroupPRI0210Full text not held
  • 25 Sep 2015Dr Nasrin RazzaqPRI0209Full text not held
  • 25 Sep 2015Arthritis Research UkPRI0208Full text not held
  • 25 Sep 2015Royal College Of PsychiatristsPRI0207Full text not held
  • 25 Sep 2015Mr Richard WakefordPRI0206Full text not held
  • 25 Sep 2015Leicester City Council Health & Wellbeing BoardPRI0205Full text not held
  • 25 Sep 2015Dr Sarah MarwickPRI0204Full text not held
  • 25 Sep 2015Care Quality CommissionPRI0202Full text not held
  • 25 Sep 2015Pharmacy VoicePRI0201Full text not held
  • 25 Sep 2015Department Of HealthPRI0200Full text not held
  • 25 Sep 2015Cancer Research UkPRI0198Full text not held
  • 25 Sep 2015Dr Kimberley BrownleePRI0197Full text not held
  • 25 Sep 2015The Patients AssociationPRI0196Full text not held
  • 25 Sep 2015Healthwatch WorcestershirePRI0194Full text not held

Correspondence 2 letters