Select committee: Health and Social Care Committee

Palliative Care

Open Opened 5 Mar 2025 13 recommendations 9 conclusions
Inquiry scope (the committee's words)
The Health and Social Care Committee has established and commissioned a politically impartial panel of experts to conduct an evaluation – independently of the Committee – of palliative care in England . The Expert Panel will produce a report after each evaluation which will be sent to the Committee to review. The Expert Panel is chaired by Professor Dame Jane Dacre, and is comprised of core (i.e. permanent) members and subject specialists. Core members of the Expert Panel are: Sir Robert Francis QC; Sir David Pearson; Professor Emma Cave; Anita Charlesworth; and Professor Stephen Peckham. Palliative care specialist members of the Expert Panel are: Anita Hayes, Clinical Quality Lead at Hospice UK; Professor Vic Rayner OBE, Chair at Global Ageing Network and CEO at National Care Forum; Dr Michael Tatterton, Chief nursing officer at Bluebell Wood Children’s Hospice and Clinical Associate Professor at the University of Bradford; Dr Sam Royston, Executive Director for Research and Policy at Marie Curie UK; and Dr Sabrina Bajwah, Honorary Consultant in Palliative Medicine at King's Health Partners and Clinical Reader at Cicely Saunders Institute. An overview of the Expert Panel’s work is available here: The Health and Social Care Committee’s Expert Panel Further information on the Expert Panel is set out in the Health & Social Care Committee Special Report: Process for independent evaluation of progress on Government commitments (5 August 2020).

Where it stands

The inquiry is open, opened 5 March 2025.

The committee has published 1 report, most recently 6th Report - Palliative Care on 24 March 2026.

The government's response

Published 19 June 2026. The deadline was 24 May 2026.

Summary written by Accountability Index from the government's response. It is not the government's own words.

The Government labels its response to each of the ten recommendations as accept, partially accept or reject, accepting most, including that of accountability arrangements for the Modern Service Framework, and rejecting two.

  • On accountability, it accepts the recommendation and says arrangements will be developed with the National Quality Board, with the full Modern Service Framework due for publication in "Autumn 2026".
  • It rejects the recommendation to reconsider removing local authority representation from ICBs, saying the current arrangement is "confusing and ineffective" and that collaboration will be at place level through health and wellbeing boards.
  • It rejects implementing a 90% Palliative Care Register target, noting there is no formal target but describing it as "a stretch target that we would like to achieve by 2029". It is "considering the target and metrics" as it develops the full MSF.
  • It partially accepts the workforce recommendation, stating "it would not be right to set targets for staffing" and that it is "not for the Government to mandate a defined set of competencies". It is "planning to have funding and places ready for March 2027/28" for the palliative care qualification modules.

Read the government's response ↗ Report an error

Recommendations and conclusions

All 22 recommendations and conclusions

Reports

All reports

Evidence

  • 1 oral evidence sessionLatest 7 January 2026
  • 46 written submissions
  • 4 witnesses
All evidence

Recent activity

Recommendations and conclusions 22 shown

Conclusion 1

Conclusion · 6th Report - Palliative Care · Addressed to Department of Health and Social Care

Concluded (the committee's words)
We were highly concerned by the findings of the Expert Panel’s report, which revealed a sector in need of urgent support across all settings, underserving individuals from already vulnerable patient groups. The end of life system is fragmented, difficult to navigate, and leaves individuals in the ‘gap’ between health and social care all too often. Without safeguards, the Government’s intention to shift palliative care to the community risks placing further unsustainable pressure on the community workforce, who are already overworked and under capacity. (Conclusion, Paragraph 8) The Modern Service Framework

Link to this item · Read this item

Conclusion 2

Conclusion · 6th Report - Palliative Care · Addressed to Department of Health and Social Care

Concluded (the committee's words)
We welcome the Government’s plans to introduce a Modern Service Framework to set national standards for palliative and end of life care services, and the Department’s commitment to co-produce this work alongside key stakeholders. However, we approach this with a level of scepticism, given the number of issues this Framework purports to resolve, and the risk the Government runs if this is not achieved. (Conclusion, Paragraph 16)

Link to this item · Read this item

Conclusion 3

Conclusion · 6th Report - Palliative Care · Addressed to Department of Health and Social Care

Concluded (the committee's words)
We are unclear about what is fundamentally different about this framework compared to existing documents, such as the Ambitions Framework and the NHS National Standards for Palliative and End of Life Care. In particular, what different approach it will take to ensure that the Framework is effectively implemented across ICBs and setting out the consequences of inaction. (Conclusion, Paragraph 17)

Link to this item · Read this item

Recommendation 4

Recommendation · 6th Report - Palliative Care · Addressed to Department of Health and Social Care

Recommended (the committee's words)
If the Modern Service Framework is to deliver meaningful change it must be more than a well-intentioned ambition. ICBs and the Department need to be held accountable for meeting the Framework, with clear consequences if its standards are not met. We call on the Government to set out, in its interim Report this Spring, what accountability arrangements will be in place to support implementation of the MSF and what concrete steps the 35 Department will take with ICBs that fall short. The Government must also ensure that ICBs have the support, tools and resources they need to deliver on the MSF. (Recommendation, Paragraph 18) Commissioning

Link to this item · Read this item

Recommendation 5

Recommendation · 6th Report - Palliative Care · Addressed to Department of Health and Social Care

Recommended (the committee's words)
We are concerned that the Minister was unable to commit to providing clear and specific standards and guidance for babies, children and young people’s palliative and end of life care in the Modern Service Framework (MSF). We strongly recommend that the Department includes specific standards within the MSF for the provision of children and young people’s palliative care services, and for the transition between child and adult services. Pan-ICB commissioning guidance should contain specific information on how to commission these services effectively. (Recommendation, Paragraph 26)

Link to this item · Read this item

Conclusion 6

Conclusion · 6th Report - Palliative Care · Addressed to Department of Health and Social Care

Concluded (the committee's words)
It is unacceptable that access to 24/7 palliative and end of life care services remains patchy throughout England. Individuals nearing the end of life should be able to access the right care, advice and medication, wherever they are and regardless of the time of day. We are pleased that the Minister committed to 100% telephone line coverage in England by 2027, but this is not enough. While telephone advice lines provide support and may prevent unnecessary hospital admissions, they are insufficient to build a resilient and effective out of hours palliative care service on their own. (Conclusion, Paragraph 35)

Link to this item · Read this item

Recommendation 7

Recommendation · 6th Report - Palliative Care · Addressed to Department of Health and Social Care

Recommended (the committee's words)
We recommend that the MSF includes specific guidelines and requirements for ICBs to enable access to 24/7 PEoLC services, including access to symptomatic medication, and in-person care where necessary. We call on the Government to provide an assessment of both the workforce needed to deliver such a service and the potential savings to the wider health and care service that such an offer would deliver. (Recommendation, Paragraph 36)

Link to this item · Read this item

Recommendation 8

Recommendation · 6th Report - Palliative Care · Addressed to Department of Health and Social Care

Recommended (the committee's words)
The role of social care in the provision of palliative and end of life care has been overlooked for far too long, and we are concerned that the Government’s plans to remove local authorities from ICBs will only make the current situation worse, particularly in the context of the Government’s aim to shift care into the community. We urge the Government to reconsider its decision to remove, through legislation, local authority representation on ICBs, to ensure social care is represented, understood and appropriately commissioned to deliver end of life care. (Recommendation, Paragraph 41) 36 Data

Link to this item · Read this item

Conclusion 9

Conclusion · 6th Report - Palliative Care · Addressed to Department of Health and Social Care

Concluded (the committee's words)
We support increasing use of the Palliative Care Register for early identification of individuals, including children and young people with PEoLC needs. However, we are concerned that its use is likely to decrease given the removal of funding incentives for primary care practitioners to add patients to the Register. (Conclusion, Paragraph 45)

Link to this item · Read this item

Recommendation 10

Recommendation · 6th Report - Palliative Care · Addressed to Department of Health and Social Care

Recommended (the committee's words)
We recommend that the Department implement the 90% target for the percentage of individuals in the last year of life documented on the Palliative Care Register and that it reports annually on progress against this target to monitor the impact of its decision to remove the financial incentive to add patients to the Register. (Recommendation, Paragraph 46)

Link to this item · Read this item

Conclusion 11

Conclusion · 6th Report - Palliative Care · Addressed to Department of Health and Social Care

Concluded (the committee's words)
National palliative and end of life care data provide valuable insight into patterns of healthcare use and location of death, however the evidence presented demonstrates substantial gaps in local data collection and utilisation. Without consistent, granular and timely data, ICBs and providers cannot reliably commission, plan, or improve palliative and end of life services in line with their population needs. (Conclusion, Paragraph 51)

Link to this item · Read this item

Recommendation 12

Recommendation · 6th Report - Palliative Care · Addressed to Department of Health and Social Care

Recommended (the committee's words)
We urge the department to mandate ICBs to maintain a fully populated palliative and end of life care dashboard that is actively used for commissioning, service planning, quality improvement, and inequality monitoring across their local system. (Recommendation, Paragraph 52)

Link to this item · Read this item

Conclusion 13

Conclusion · 6th Report - Palliative Care · Addressed to Department of Health and Social Care

Concluded (the committee's words)
Poor data sharing and lack of integration across NHS, social care, voluntary and private providers creates confusion, delays and gaps in continuity for people at the end of life, frequently placing the burden of coordination care on patients and carers during what is an extremely emotional and challenging period. Despite existing systems for data sharing, inconsistent uptake, poor interoperability and limited outcome-level information reduce effectiveness. (Conclusion, Paragraph 55)

Link to this item · Read this item

Recommendation 14

Recommendation · 6th Report - Palliative Care · Addressed to Department of Health and Social Care

Recommended (the committee's words)
If the Government intends for the introduction of the Single Patient Record to address concerns about a lack of service integration for palliative and end of life care, then this record must be available to all providers—including social care, the voluntary sector and private providers. The Government should also set out in its response to this Report how it will use the introduction of the Single Patient Record to drive integration across different types of providers. (Recommendation, Paragraph 56) 37 Workforce

Link to this item · Read this item

Conclusion 15

Conclusion · 6th Report - Palliative Care · Addressed to Department of Health and Social Care

Concluded (the committee's words)
Generalist staff, who provide most end of life care, often lack the skills, confidence and specialist support required to deliver high-quality, person-centred care. Despite existing initiatives, a clearer, system-wide approach to upskilling the generalist workforce is urgently needed. (Conclusion, Paragraph 63)

Link to this item · Read this item

Recommendation 16

Recommendation · 6th Report - Palliative Care · Addressed to Department of Health and Social Care

Recommended (the committee's words)
We recommend that end of life care be included as a core skill for the generalist health and social care workforce, with a clear and defined set of competencies required to deliver high-quality and person-centred palliative and end of life care. This should be reflected in the forthcoming 10 Year Workforce Plan. In particular, the critical role that social care staff play in delivering palliative care should be acknowledged in the Plan, and reflected in the training and support social care staff receive to enable them to provide this care in a more systematic way. While we welcome the Qualification in Specialism Standard for Palliative and End-of-Life Care, we ask the Department to provide further information in its response to this Report on who will be required to complete this training and when it will become available. (Recommendation, Paragraph 64)

Link to this item · Read this item

Recommendation 17

Recommendation · 6th Report - Palliative Care · Addressed to Department of Health and Social Care

Recommended (the committee's words)
Current shortages in the specialist workforce are putting palliative care services in an unsustainable position which threatens their ability to deliver equitable and high-quality palliative and end of life care. Extensive consultant vacancies, impending retirements, limited training places and widespread nursing shortages all contribute to an inability to meet demand, with particular staff shortages experienced in children and young people’s palliative care. This is an unacceptable situation, and urgent action is needed address these shortages. (Conclusion, Paragraph 68)

Link to this item · Read this item

Recommendation 18

Recommendation · 6th Report - Palliative Care · Addressed to Department of Health and Social Care

Recommended (the committee's words)
The Government need to publish an evidence-based plan, supported by up-to-date workforce modelling, setting out how it will increase the capacity and sustainability of all sectors of the specialist palliative and end of life care workforce, as part of the 10 Year Workforce Plan. This should include plans for clear training pathways and a specific target for the staffing of children and young people’s palliative care. (Recommendation, Paragraph 69) Bereavement

Link to this item · Read this item

Conclusion 19

Conclusion · 6th Report - Palliative Care · Addressed to Department of Health and Social Care

Concluded (the committee's words)
Bereavement, and pre-bereavement support are essential, yet access remains patchy, poorly commissioned, and often difficult to navigate. Despite its inclusion in the current Ambition Framework, significant gaps persist, particularly for culturally diverse communities and children and young people. (Conclusion, Paragraph 75) 38

Link to this item · Read this item

Recommendation 20

Recommendation · 6th Report - Palliative Care · Addressed to Department of Health and Social Care

Recommended (the committee's words)
The Government must hold ICBs to account for delivering bereavement services. This does not need to wait for the forthcoming Modern Service Framework as there are already clearly defined expectations for what ICBs should deliver in this area. In its response to this Report, we ask that the Department sets out how it will monitor ICBs’ current delivery of bereavement services, and what steps will be taken with ICBs that do not deliver an acceptable level of service. (Recommendation, Paragraph 76) Hospices

Link to this item · Read this item

Recommendation 21

Recommendation · 6th Report - Palliative Care · Addressed to Department of Health and Social Care

Recommended (the committee's words)
Hospices form an integral part of palliative and end of life care provision at home and in the community and we welcome the fact that the Government intends for them to play a bigger role as part of its shift to neighbourhood health. However, if the Government want hospices to deliver a universal and equitable service, this must be matched with additional resources. We were unconvinced by the Government’s argument that this will be addressed simply by improving the data that ICBs have access to. (Conclusion, Paragraph 83)

Link to this item · Read this item

Recommendation 22

Recommendation · 6th Report - Palliative Care · Addressed to Department of Health and Social Care

Recommended (the committee's words)
We recommend that the Government moves towards sustainable and predictable models of funding for hospices, financing their running as well as investment costs, which reflects the increasingly central role they will play in delivering end of life care. This funding should be accompanied by conditions that require hospices to play a greater role in actively addressing inequalities in access to their services. (Recommendation, Paragraph 84) 39

Link to this item · Read this item

Reports

1 report

Oral evidence sessions

1 session

On smaller screens, scroll horizontally to read every column. Keyboard users can focus the table region and use the arrow keys.

Date Session and witnesses Source
7 Jan 2026
Oral Evidence
Dr Amanda Doyle OBE · NHS England, Dr Edward Scully · Department of Health and Social Care, Dr Sarah Mitchell · NHS England, Stephen Kinnock MP · Department of Health and Social Care
View ↗

Written evidence

46 submissions recorded

Submission metadata is shown here; use the source links to read the evidence on Parliament’s website.

On smaller screens, scroll horizontally to read every column. Keyboard users can focus the table region and use the arrow keys.

ReferenceDateSubmitter
PLC0049 28 Jan 2026 Anglia Ruskin University
PLC0015 4 Aug 2025 Northamptonshire ICB
PLC0014 4 Aug 2025 Local Government Association
PLC0013 4 Aug 2025 NIHR Policy Research Unit in Healthy Ageing
PLC0012 4 Aug 2025 Mountbatten Hospice Group
PLC0011 4 Aug 2025 Dr Kate Woodthorpe, University of Bath
PLC0010 4 Aug 2025 Institute for Medieval Studies, University of Leeds
PLC0009 4 Aug 2025 Professor Catherine Walshe, Lancaster University
PLC0008 4 Aug 2025 NHS North East London ICB
PLC0007 4 Aug 2025 NHS Surrey Heartlands ICB
PLC0006 4 Aug 2025 Palliative and End of Life Care research group, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge
PLC0005 4 Aug 2025 Association of Ambulance Chief Executives
PLC0004 4 Aug 2025 Professor Nancy Preston, Lancaster University
PLC0003 4 Aug 2025 Dr Polly Edmonds, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
PLC0002 4 Aug 2025 Dr Anna-Karenia Anderson, Shooting Star Children' Hospice and Royal Marsden Hosptial
PLC0001 4 Aug 2025 Association for Paediatric Palliative Medicine
PLC0030 4 Aug 2025 University of Bristol
PLC0029 4 Aug 2025 Healthwatch England
PLC0028 4 Aug 2025 Care Rights UK
PLC0027 4 Aug 2025 Association for Palliative Medicine of Great Britain and Ireland
PLC0026 4 Aug 2025 Cicely Saunders Institute
PLC0025 4 Aug 2025 Together for Short Lives
PLC0024 4 Aug 2025 Dementia UK
PLC0023 4 Aug 2025 Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery & Palliative Care, King's College London
PLC0022 4 Aug 2025 NHS Norfolk and Waveney Integrated Care Board
PLC0021 4 Aug 2025 NHS Benchmarking Network
PLC0020 4 Aug 2025 British Geriatrics Society
PLC0019 4 Aug 2025 University of Leeds
PLC0018 4 Aug 2025 End of Life Doula UK
PLC0017 4 Aug 2025 West Yorkshire Integrated Care Board
PLC0016 4 Aug 2025 Community Hospitals Association
PLC0047 4 Aug 2025 RAND Europe
PLC0046 4 Aug 2025 Wolfson Palliative Care Research Centre
PLC0044 4 Aug 2025 Department for Health and Social Care
PLC0043 4 Aug 2025 Compassion in Dying
PLC0042 4 Aug 2025 Sue Ryder
PLC0041 4 Aug 2025 Rainbow Trust Children's Charity
PLC0040 4 Aug 2025 National Bereavement Alliance
PLC0039 4 Aug 2025 Hospice UK
PLC0038 4 Aug 2025 Royal College of General Practitioners
PLC0036 4 Aug 2025 Gold Standards Framework Centre
PLC0034 4 Aug 2025 Professor Emeritus Sam H. Ahmedzai, University o Sheffield
PLC0033 4 Aug 2025 Dr John Dean, Royal College of Physicians
PLC0032 4 Aug 2025 Marie Curie
PLC0031 4 Aug 2025 Association of Palliative Care Social Workers
PLC0048 4 Aug 2025 Marie Price, Association of Palliative Care Social Workers

Who gave evidence

4 witnesses

On smaller screens, scroll horizontally to read every column. Keyboard users can focus the table region and use the arrow keys.

WitnessOrganisationSessions
Dr Amanda Doyle OBE · National Director for Primary Care and Community Services NHS England 1
Dr Edward Scully · Director for Primary and Community Health Care Department of Health and Social Care 1
Dr Sarah Mitchell · National Clinical Director for Palliative and End-of Life Care NHS England 1
Stephen Kinnock MP · Minster of State Department of Health and Social Care 1

Correspondence

2 letters

On smaller screens, scroll horizontally to read every column. Keyboard users can focus the table region and use the arrow keys.