The Health and Social Care Committee has established and commissioned a politically impartial panel of experts to conduct an evaluation – independently of the Committee – of palliative care in England . The Expert Panel will produce a report after each evaluation which will be sent to the Committee to review. The Expert Panel is …
| Title | HC No. | Published | Items | Response |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6th Report - Palliative Care | HC 1763 | 24 Mar 2026 | 22 | Pending |
We were highly concerned by the findings of the Expert Panel’s report, which revealed a sector in need of urgent support across all settings, underserving individuals from already vulnerable patient groups. The end of life system is fragmented, difficult to navigate, and leaves individuals in the ‘gap’ between health and …
We welcome the Government’s plans to introduce a Modern Service Framework to set national standards for palliative and end of life care services, and the Department’s commitment to co-produce this work alongside key stakeholders. However, we approach this with a level of scepticism, given the number of issues this Framework …
We are unclear about what is fundamentally different about this framework compared to existing documents, such as the Ambitions Framework and the NHS National Standards for Palliative and End of Life Care. In particular, what different approach it will take to ensure that the Framework is effectively implemented across ICBs …
If the Modern Service Framework is to deliver meaningful change it must be more than a well-intentioned ambition. ICBs and the Department need to be held accountable for meeting the Framework, with clear consequences if its standards are not met. We call on the Government to set out, in its …
We are concerned that the Minister was unable to commit to providing clear and specific standards and guidance for babies, children and young people’s palliative and end of life care in the Modern Service Framework (MSF). We strongly recommend that the Department includes specific standards within the MSF for the …
It is unacceptable that access to 24/7 palliative and end of life care services remains patchy throughout England. Individuals nearing the end of life should be able to access the right care, advice and medication, wherever they are and regardless of the time of day. We are pleased that the …
We recommend that the MSF includes specific guidelines and requirements for ICBs to enable access to 24/7 PEoLC services, including access to symptomatic medication, and in-person care where necessary. We call on the Government to provide an assessment of both the workforce needed to deliver such a service and the …
The role of social care in the provision of palliative and end of life care has been overlooked for far too long, and we are concerned that the Government’s plans to remove local authorities from ICBs will only make the current situation worse, particularly in the context of the Government’s …
We support increasing use of the Palliative Care Register for early identification of individuals, including children and young people with PEoLC needs. However, we are concerned that its use is likely to decrease given the removal of funding incentives for primary care practitioners to add patients to the Register. (Conclusion, …
We recommend that the Department implement the 90% target for the percentage of individuals in the last year of life documented on the Palliative Care Register and that it reports annually on progress against this target to monitor the impact of its decision to remove the financial incentive to add …
National palliative and end of life care data provide valuable insight into patterns of healthcare use and location of death, however the evidence presented demonstrates substantial gaps in local data collection and utilisation. Without consistent, granular and timely data, ICBs and providers cannot reliably commission, plan, or improve palliative and …
We urge the department to mandate ICBs to maintain a fully populated palliative and end of life care dashboard that is actively used for commissioning, service planning, quality improvement, and inequality monitoring across their local system. (Recommendation, Paragraph 52)
Poor data sharing and lack of integration across NHS, social care, voluntary and private providers creates confusion, delays and gaps in continuity for people at the end of life, frequently placing the burden of coordination care on patients and carers during what is an extremely emotional and challenging period. Despite …
If the Government intends for the introduction of the Single Patient Record to address concerns about a lack of service integration for palliative and end of life care, then this record must be available to all providers—including social care, the voluntary sector and private providers. The Government should also set …
Generalist staff, who provide most end of life care, often lack the skills, confidence and specialist support required to deliver high-quality, person-centred care. Despite existing initiatives, a clearer, system-wide approach to upskilling the generalist workforce is urgently needed. (Conclusion, Paragraph 63)
We recommend that end of life care be included as a core skill for the generalist health and social care workforce, with a clear and defined set of competencies required to deliver high-quality and person-centred palliative and end of life care. This should be reflected in the forthcoming 10 Year …
Current shortages in the specialist workforce are putting palliative care services in an unsustainable position which threatens their ability to deliver equitable and high-quality palliative and end of life care. Extensive consultant vacancies, impending retirements, limited training places and widespread nursing shortages all contribute to an inability to meet demand, …
The Government need to publish an evidence-based plan, supported by up-to-date workforce modelling, setting out how it will increase the capacity and sustainability of all sectors of the specialist palliative and end of life care workforce, as part of the 10 Year Workforce Plan. This should include plans for clear …
Bereavement, and pre-bereavement support are essential, yet access remains patchy, poorly commissioned, and often difficult to navigate. Despite its inclusion in the current Ambition Framework, significant gaps persist, particularly for culturally diverse communities and children and young people. (Conclusion, Paragraph 75) 38
The Government must hold ICBs to account for delivering bereavement services. This does not need to wait for the forthcoming Modern Service Framework as there are already clearly defined expectations for what ICBs should deliver in this area. In its response to this Report, we ask that the Department sets …
Hospices form an integral part of palliative and end of life care provision at home and in the community and we welcome the fact that the Government intends for them to play a bigger role as part of its shift to neighbourhood health. However, if the Government want hospices to …
We recommend that the Government moves towards sustainable and predictable models of funding for hospices, financing their running as well as investment costs, which reflects the increasingly central role they will play in delivering end of life care. This funding should be accompanied by conditions that require hospices to play …
| Date | Witnesses | |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Jan 2026 | Dr Amanda Doyle OBE · NHS England, Dr Edward Scully · Department of Health and Social Care, Dr Sarah Mitchell · NHS England, Stephen Kinnock MP · Department of Health and Social Care | View ↗ |
| Date | Direction | Title |
|---|---|---|
| 4 Feb 2026 | — | Correspondence from Minister Kinnock - Follow up on 7 January session |
| 14 Jan 2025 | — | Correspondence from the Chair to the SoS relating to palliative care |