Select committee: Health and Social Care Committee

The impact of body image on mental and physical health

Closed Opened 1 Dec 2021 Closed 6 Feb 2023 19 recommendations 7 conclusions
Inquiry scope (the committee's words)
MPs will examine the relationship between people’s perception of their body image and their physical and mental health. They will consider how far people’s perception of body image can hinder access to NHS services and whether NHS training and Government messaging should be altered.

Where it stands

The inquiry is closed, opened 1 December 2021.

The committee has published 1 report, most recently Second Report - The impact of body image on mental and physical health on 2 August 2022.

The government's response

Published 7 February 2023. The deadline was 2 October 2022.

Summary written by Accountability Index from the government's response. It is not the government's own words.

The government "strongly agrees" there is a need for cross-government work on body image, but says there is not an immediate need for a standalone strategy and that it will not meet the committee's timeline for licensing non-surgical cosmetic procedures.

  • On eating disorders, it expects them to be considered within the major conditions strategy (interim report due in the summer), so "does not intend to publish a separate national eating disorder strategy". It accepts the research part of the recommendation.
  • It agrees that diagnosis and treatment of body dysmorphic disorder (BDD) is a priority, but says this is "best achieved through the current training, referral routes and curriculum".
  • On non-surgical cosmetic procedures, it is taking forward a licensing scheme but says it "will not be able to meet the timeline recommended by the committee". DHSC will agree the procedures in scope and communicate a plan for delivery by July 2023.
  • On screen time, it says much more research is needed before national guidance. DHSC will work with DCMS and DfE on gathering evidence "before deciding whether to progress with a nationwide public health campaign", which would be contingent on future funding settlements.

Read the government's response ↗ Report an error

Recommendations and conclusions 26 shown

1: Initiate comprehensive cross-government strategy to tackle growing problem of body dissatisfaction and its consequences.

Recommendation · Second Report - The impact of body image on mental and physical health · Addressed to Department of Health and Social Care

Recommended (the committee's words)
We urge the Government to immediately initiate a comprehensive cross-government strategy that brings together, at the very least, the Department of Health and Social Care, the Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport, and the Department for Education to tackle the current growing problem of body dissatisfaction and its related health, educational and social consequences. This strategy should include, but not be limited, to education about self-worth, body positivity, critical thinking and appraising images, as well as wider health advice such spotting signs and symptoms of eating disorders, anxiety and depression and body dysmorphia, within educational, health and online/media settings.

Link to this item · Read this item

2: Commission and fund new research into causes of body image dissatisfaction and social media impact.

Recommendation · Second Report - The impact of body image on mental and physical health · Addressed to Department of Health and Social Care

Recommended (the committee's words)
We recommend that the Department of Health and Social Care, along with the National Institute for Health Research, commission and fund new research to understand the causal pathways that are leading to a rise in body image dissatisfaction across the population and the impact of social media on body image. This is of particular importance in relation to groups that are known to be particularly affected by body image dissatisfaction: for example, adolescents, people with disabilities and LGBT people. However, it is also vital for groups in relation to which the understanding of body image dissatisfaction is less clear, such as those from BAME communities and older people.

Link to this item · Read this item

3: Prioritise BDD diagnosis and treatment by updating curricula and embedding specialist practitioners.

Recommendation · Second Report - The impact of body image on mental and physical health · Addressed to Department of Health and Social Care

Recommended (the committee's words)
We urge the Department to ensure more is done to make the diagnosis and treatment of Body Dysmorphic Disorder (BDD) a priority. From a diagnostic perspective, we recommend that Health Education England update the IAPT (Improving Access to Psychological Therapies) and EMHP (Educational Mental Health Practitioner) curricula to make training in BDD compulsory for all mental health practitioners. The Government should ensure BDD is included in the PSHE (personal, social, health and economic) education curricula within the section on body image, to promote early detection and early intervention within schools. As well as improved diagnosis rates, suitable care for those living with BDD must be available. We recommend that BDD specialist practitioners are eventually embedded into the multidisciplinary teams in every new community model for adults severely affected by mental illness.

Link to this item · Read this item

4: Explore using family hubs to educate young people and parents about body image and self-worth.

Recommendation · Second Report - The impact of body image on mental and physical health · Addressed to Department of Health and Social Care

Recommended (the committee's words)
We call on the Government to better equip future generations and their families with the skills and resources required to tackle body image issues. These skills and resources include critical thinking, particularly when it comes to appraising images, and self- worth. We recommend that the Government explores the use of family hubs as a route to educate parents and young people about body image, self-worth, and body positivity.

Link to this item · Read this item

5: Review training for Mental Health Practitioners to include early signs of conditions related to body image.

Recommendation · Second Report - The impact of body image on mental and physical health · Addressed to Department of Health and Social Care

Recommended (the committee's words)
We commend the Government’s work to date to introduce Education Mental Health Practitioners within school-based Mental Health Support Teams across the country, as well as the commitment to have a Mental Health Lead teacher in schools. We recommend that the Government review the training of these practitioners to ensure it includes spotting early signs of conditions related to body image issues. We ask the Government to provide us with a further update on their progress in introducing these roles and to set out the timeframe for establishing them in every school in England.

Link to this item · Read this item

6: Coordinated approach essential to understand and tackle the growing issue of eating disorders.

Conclusion · Second Report - The impact of body image on mental and physical health · Addressed to Department of Health and Social Care

Concluded (the committee's words)
While we commend the funding set aside for eating disorders to date and the actions taken by the Government so far, we are now of the opinion that a more co- ordinated approach is essential to properly understand and tackle this growing issue

Link to this item · Read this item

7: Develop national eating disorder strategy, increase funding, and address regional inequalities in care.

Recommendation · Second Report - The impact of body image on mental and physical health · Addressed to Department of Health and Social Care

Recommended (the committee's words)
We recommend that the Government develops a national eating disorder strategy that aims to understand the causal mechanisms that lead to the development of eating disorders and earmarks adequate funding to bolster existing services as well as to increase investment in research. We further recommend that alongside the quarterly publication of data on existing access and waiting time standards across every region, the Government pledges and provides additional resources to address any increase in the need for treatment identified, in order to eliminate regional inequalities in care.

Link to this item · Read this item

8: Commission national review of anabolic steroid use and launch safe use awareness campaign.

Recommendation · Second Report - The impact of body image on mental and physical health · Addressed to Department of Health and Social Care

Recommended (the committee's words)
We recommend that the Department commissions a national review of the growing use of anabolic steroids in England as it relates to body image. We further recommend that the Department introduces a national awareness campaign around safe anabolic steroid use. This ought to be coordinated through existing steroid user support groups and targeted at areas of highest risk, such as gyms with a high proportion of body builders.

Link to this item · Read this item

9: Introduce legislation to mandate a logo label for all digitally altered commercial body images.

Recommendation · Second Report - The impact of body image on mental and physical health · Addressed to Department of Health and Social Care

Recommended (the committee's words)
We call on the Government to work with advertisers to feature a wider variety of body aesthetics, and work with industry and the ASA to encourage advertisers and influencers not to doctor their images. We believe the Government should introduce legislation that ensures commercial images are labelled with a logo where any part of the body, including its proportions and skin tone, are digitally altered.

Link to this item · Read this item

10: Establish a national ‘Screen Cross Code’ public health campaign for children’s safe screen use.

Recommendation · Second Report - The impact of body image on mental and physical health · Addressed to Department of Health and Social Care

Recommended (the committee's words)
We echo the call of our witness Professor Sandeep Ranote for the creation of a national public health strategy akin to the 1970s ‘Green Cross Code’. A ‘Screen Cross Code’ would be a nationwide public health campaign, which would use short effective messages to educate the public on best practice with screen use for children and young people, as well as the potential negative health impacts resulting from excessive screen use or exposure to content that may lead to body dissatisfaction. This should include limits on daily screen use, promotion of social media sabbaticals, having digital sunrises/sunsets, as well as prompts to encourage discussion between parents and their children if there is content that could cause concern relating to body image and self-esteem. We recommend that the Department of Health and Social Care plays a leading role, in collaboration with the Department for Education and the Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport, in this work, given its implications for young people’s health.

Link to this item · Read this item

11: Integrate body image training into medical, nursing, and parent-interacting professional programmes within two years.

Recommendation · Second Report - The impact of body image on mental and physical health · Addressed to Department of Health and Social Care

Recommended (the committee's words)
We urge Health Education England, the General Medical Council and Nursing and Midwifery Council to collaborate with third sector organisations that are currently educating people about, and promoting awareness of, body image issues, and after a period of assessment, integrate the most effective existing training and resources into all training programmes within the medical, nursing and midwifery fields within the next two years. We echo the Mental Health Foundation’s recommendation for any further training for professionals interacting with parents - that is, GPs, health visitors, dietitians and other frontline practitioners - to include information about how parents and carers can, from a very early age, positively influence their children’s feelings about their bodies through the behaviours and attitudes they express.

Link to this item · Read this item

12: Government delays restrictions on unhealthy food multibuy deals, hindering obesity efforts.

Conclusion · Second Report - The impact of body image on mental and physical health · Addressed to Department of Health and Social Care

Concluded (the committee's words)
We were extremely disappointed that during the inquiry, the Government delayed the introduction of restrictions on multibuy deals on food and drinks high in fat, salt, or sugar, including buy-one-get-one-free deals. It is essential that the Government prioritises interventions that provide a healthy environment, rather than focusing solely on individual action. We are frustrated that the Government has not made more progress in tackling the obesity crisis in our population.

Link to this item · Read this item

13: Introduce annual holistic health and wellbeing assessments for all children and young people.

Conclusion · Second Report - The impact of body image on mental and physical health · Addressed to Department of Health and Social Care

Concluded (the committee's words)
We propose that, in line with the introduction of Integrated Care Systems which seek to tackle health inequalities and focus on prevention, the Department ought to bolster the Healthy Child Programme, the programme for prevention and public health of children and young people aged 0–19-year-old and their families. We propose that the Government introduce annual holistic health and wellbeing assessments for every child and young person, using the existing workforce of school nurses, health visitors, as well as those in associated roles such as community paediatrics and primary care. These assessments should monitor a range of physical and mental health markers including, but not limited to, weight and mental wellbeing. They should provide an opportunity to explore the context in which the young person and their family live, how these circumstances can relate to their health. They should aim to engage the wider family (if appropriate, depending on age) to ensure early detection of potential health risks, with signposting to appropriate services if required.

Link to this item · Read this item

14: Implement population-level policies to tackle obesity and immediately restrict unhealthy food multibuy deals.

Recommendation · Second Report - The impact of body image on mental and physical health · Addressed to Department of Health and Social Care

Recommended (the committee's words)
We urge the Government to implement population-level policies that ensure healthier choices and lifestyles are made a priority in tackling obesity rates, rather than schemes that focus solely on weight loss and can engender weight stigma and result in adverse health outcomes. We were disappointed by the Government’s delay in restricting multibuy deals for foods and drinks high in fat, salt, or sugar–including buy one get one free. We urge the Government to reconsider this decision and to implement this measure immediately.

Link to this item · Read this item

15: Obesity reduction requires tackling weight stigma alongside improving population health.

Conclusion · Second Report - The impact of body image on mental and physical health · Addressed to Department of Health and Social Care

Concluded (the committee's words)
Throughout the inquiry, we have been aware of the importance and complexities involved in tackling obesity rates to improve population health and reducing weight stigma to not perpetuate mental and physical health issues.

Link to this item · Read this item

16: Integrate weight stigma training into healthcare curricula and review obesity campaign language.

Recommendation · Second Report - The impact of body image on mental and physical health · Addressed to Department of Health and Social Care

Recommended (the committee's words)
We recommend that the Government undertakes an urgent review of its current campaigns related to obesity and alters any language or media used that fail to 36 The impact of body image on mental and physical health mention being underweight is as big a risk as being overweight. We also recommend that training on weight stigma is integrated into undergraduate and trainee curricula in all medical, nursing and other allied professional programmes to address stigma early on. This requires professional bodies and Health Education England to update their curricula and training standards, coupled with training offered to all current clinical staff, on how best to discuss weight and health.

Link to this item · Read this item

17: Fund research into tackling obesity, eliminating weight stigma, and weight-neutral interventions.

Recommendation · Second Report - The impact of body image on mental and physical health · Addressed to Department of Health and Social Care

Recommended (the committee's words)
There needs to be further research to establish how best to tackle obesity while eliminating weight stigma and discrimination, and to establish the efficacy of weight- neutral interventions, and we recommend that the National Institute for Health Research put aside funding for this purpose.

Link to this item · Read this item

18: Introduce a licensing regime for non-surgical cosmetic procedures by July 2023.

Recommendation · Second Report - The impact of body image on mental and physical health · Addressed to Department of Health and Social Care

Recommended (the committee's words)
The risk of exploitation of vulnerable groups seeking non-surgical cosmetic procedures is too great and we recommend that to prevent further exploitation, the Department immediately draws up a clear timeframe for the consultation process. We urge the Government to make this a priority and to introduce the licensing regime for non-surgical cosmetic procedures by July 2023

Link to this item · Read this item

19: Vulnerable individuals lack sufficient time to consider non-surgical cosmetic procedure decisions.

Conclusion · Second Report - The impact of body image on mental and physical health · Addressed to Department of Health and Social Care

Concluded (the committee's words)
The dangers posed by non-surgical cosmetic procedures in vulnerable groups have been evident throughout the inquiry. The new licensing regime provides an opportunity to ensure that anyone planning to undertake a non-surgical cosmetic procedure has the time and space to consider their decision, and weigh up the risks and benefits. It is clear this is not currently the case for everyone in that position.

Link to this item · Read this item

20: Introduce two-part consent and 48-hour cooling-off period for non-surgical cosmetic procedures.

Recommendation · Second Report - The impact of body image on mental and physical health · Addressed to Department of Health and Social Care

Recommended (the committee's words)
We recommend that the new licensing regime for non-surgical cosmetic procedures includes a commitment to a two-part consent process for anyone considering having a non-surgical cosmetic procedure, including, at a minimum, a full medical and mental health history, as well as a mandatory 48-hour cooling off period between the consent process and undergoing the procedure. We further believe that information provided to patients or clients who are considering any treatments should always be provided with information in an accessible format to ensure they are able to make an informed choice about their proposed treatment.

Link to this item · Read this item

21: Specific premises standards and extended enforcement powers are needed for non-surgical cosmetic procedures.

Conclusion · Second Report - The impact of body image on mental and physical health · Addressed to Department of Health and Social Care

Concluded (the committee's words)
There should be specific premises standards for all beauty salons and non-CQC registered premises providing non-surgical cosmetic procedures. Local Authority Enforcement Officers should be given extended powers to enforce compliance with a nationally agreed set of premises standards.

Link to this item · Read this item

22: Minimum education and training standards for non-surgical cosmetic practitioners are currently lacking.

Recommendation · Second Report - The impact of body image on mental and physical health · Addressed to Department of Health and Social Care

Recommended (the committee's words)
We are convinced that there is a need for a minimum standard to be met in regards to the education and training of practitioners who perform non-surgical cosmetic procedures. It is essential to ensure patient safety, and thus should be a central pillar of a future licensing regime. The Professional Standards Authority should be given the power to oversee a register of approved training providers. All training providers should have to meet an Ofqual-regulated standard.

Link to this item · Read this item

23: Review dermal filler licensing to make them prescription-only substances, like Botox.

Recommendation · Second Report - The impact of body image on mental and physical health · Addressed to Department of Health and Social Care

Recommended (the committee's words)
We recommend that the Department review the licencing of dermal fillers to be prescription-only substances, in line with Botox, in order to provide more protection for people undertaking procedures involving dermal fillers.

Link to this item · Read this item

24: Establish a 'Non-Surgical Cosmetic Procedures' safety taskforce for coordinated regulation and patient safety.

Recommendation · Second Report - The impact of body image on mental and physical health · Addressed to Department of Health and Social Care

Recommended (the committee's words)
We recommend that the Department establish a ‘Non-Surgical Cosmetic Procedures’ safety taskforce that comprises each of the regulatory bodies that have input into the sector, including the MHRA, the nine statutory bodies, the ASA and stakeholders like the JCCP, Save Face and other industry bodies. This taskforce’s remit should be centred on patient safety and should include, but not be limited to, examining the issues of remote prescribing, appropriateness of premises, education and training standards as well as accountability and governance. The existence of a taskforce should provide the opportunity for a more co-ordinated approach. The taskforce should also review the impact and operation of the future licensing regime when it is in place. We also heard evidence about the difficulties in enforcing existing regulations of non-surgical cosmetic procedures, as complaints relating to an aesthetic practice often span a number of different regulators. The new safety taskforce must ensure a coordinated approach to the enforcement of new and existing regulations in the industry, and the Government must ensure sufficient resources are available to the relevant bodies.

Link to this item · Read this item

26: Mandate display of kitemark and warning logo on all non-surgical cosmetic procedure advertisements.

Recommendation · Second Report - The impact of body image on mental and physical health · Addressed to Department of Health and Social Care

Recommended (the committee's words)
We recommend that the new licensing regime should include the requirement to display a kitemark and a warning logo on any advertisement for treatments that fall within the regime’s scope.

Link to this item · Read this item

Reports

1 report

Oral evidence sessions

3 sessions

On smaller screens, scroll horizontally to read every column. Keyboard users can focus the table region and use the arrow keys.

Date Session and witnesses Source
17 May 2022
Oral evidence session
Charles King, lived experience witness, Dr Angela Meadows · University of Essex, Gillian Keegan MP · Department for Education, Helen James · Nutriri, Tam Fry · National Obesity Forum, Zoe Seager · Department of Health and Social Care
View ↗
26 Apr 2022
Oral evidence session
Ashton Collins · Save Face, Kim Booker, lived experience witness, Lucy Thorpe · Mental Health Foundation, Malcolm Phillips · Advertising Standards Authority, Professor David Sines · Joint Council for Cosmetic Practitioners - The JCCP, Professor James McVeigh · Manchester Metropolitan University, Professor Jean McHale · University of Birmingham
View ↗
8 Mar 2022
Oral evidence session
Alex Light, Journalist and Influencer, Dr Georgina Krebs · University College London, Dr Stuart Flint · University of Leeds, James Brittain-McVey, Lead Guitarist in the Vamps and Campaigner, Nyome Nicholas-Williams, Model and Activist, Professor Heather Widdows · University of Birmingham, Professor Sandeep Ranote · Greater Manchester Health and Social Care Partnership
View ↗

Written evidence

49 submissions recorded

Submission metadata is shown here; use the source links to read the evidence on Parliament’s website.

On smaller screens, scroll horizontally to read every column. Keyboard users can focus the table region and use the arrow keys.

ReferenceDateSubmitter
IBI0053 5 Jul 2022 Tam Fry, National Obesity Forum
IBI0051 14 Jun 2022 University of Essex
IBI0050 11 May 2022 JCCP 2
IBI0015 9 Mar 2022 The Children and Young People's Mental Health Coalition
IBI0014 9 Mar 2022 Be Bold Be You boudoir photography at Studio1825
IBI0013 9 Mar 2022 Girlguiding
IBI0012 9 Mar 2022 YoungMinds
IBI0011 9 Mar 2022 Ms Emi Howe, Real Talk Solutions
IBI0010 9 Mar 2022 Mermaids
IBI0009 9 Mar 2022 Bite Back 2030
IBI0008 9 Mar 2022 Mr Harry Wallis, University of Sheffield
IBI0007 9 Mar 2022 Nottingham Trent University
IBI0006 9 Mar 2022 British Skin Foundation
IBI0005 9 Mar 2022 Dr John Day, University of Essex
IBI0004 9 Mar 2022 The Cadogan Clinic
IBI0003 9 Mar 2022 Joint Council for Cosmetic Practitioners -The JCCP
IBI0001 9 Mar 2022 Dr Alison Owen, Staffordshire University
IBI0029 9 Mar 2022 Dr Georgina Krebs, University College London
IBI0028 9 Mar 2022 British Psychological Society
IBI0027 9 Mar 2022 The Rt Hon Kevan Jones MP, Parliament
IBI0026 9 Mar 2022 Breast Cancer Now
IBI0025 9 Mar 2022 British Heart Foundation
IBI0024 9 Mar 2022 Changing Faces
IBI0023 9 Mar 2022 Internet Matters
IBI0022 9 Mar 2022 Transform Hospital Group
IBI0021 9 Mar 2022 The Food Foundation
IBI0020 9 Mar 2022 Miss Bryony Davies, University of Portsmouth; What Works Centre for Wellbeing
IBI0019 9 Mar 2022 Nuffield Council on Bioethics
IBI0018 9 Mar 2022 Professor Andrew Hill, York St John University
IBI0017 9 Mar 2022 Advertising Standards Authority
IBI0016 9 Mar 2022 Food Active
IBI0045 9 Mar 2022 National Hair & Beauty Federation
IBI0044 9 Mar 2022 VCSFE Nutriri
IBI0043 9 Mar 2022 CLOSER, the home of longitudinal research (UCL Social Research Institute)
IBI0042 9 Mar 2022 Dr Angela Meadows, University of Essex
IBI0041 9 Mar 2022 Obesity Health Alliance
IBI0040 9 Mar 2022 Mr Mark Heffernan, Impact on Urban Health
IBI0039 9 Mar 2022 Dr Helge Gillmeister, University of Essex
IBI0038 9 Mar 2022 LGB Alliance
IBI0037 9 Mar 2022 Diabetes UK
IBI0036 9 Mar 2022 Dr Stuart William Flint, University of Leeds
IBI0035 9 Mar 2022 Mr Christopher Bell, Brunel University
IBI0034 9 Mar 2022 This submission addresses the Call for Evidence Question “What form should a regulatory regime for non-surgical cosmetic procedures take in order to improve patient safety?” Jean McHale, Centre for Health Law Science and Policy, Birmingham Law School, University of Birmingham.
IBI0033 9 Mar 2022 MRS DAWN KNIGHT, Newcastle College
IBI0032 9 Mar 2022 Body Dysmorphic Disorder Foundation
IBI0031 9 Mar 2022 Dr Emily Hunt, Brunel University London
IBI0048 9 Mar 2022 University of Wolverhampton
IBI0047 9 Mar 2022 Department of Health and Social Care
IBI0046 9 Mar 2022 Mental Health Foundation

Who gave evidence

20 witnesses

On smaller screens, scroll horizontally to read every column. Keyboard users can focus the table region and use the arrow keys.

WitnessOrganisationSessions
Alex Light, Journalist and Influencer Not recorded 1
Ashton Collins · Director Save Face 1
Charles King, lived experience witness Not recorded 1
Dr Angela Meadows · Lecturer, Department of Psychology University of Essex 1
Dr Georgina Krebs · Associate Professor in Young Person's Mental Health and Cognitive Behavioural Therapy University College London 1
Dr Stuart Flint · Associate Professor of Psychology University of Leeds 1
Gillian Keegan MP · Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Minister for Apprenticeships and Skills) Department for Education 1
Helen James · Founder Nutriri 1
James Brittain-McVey, Lead Guitarist in the Vamps and Campaigner Not recorded 1
Kim Booker, lived experience witness Not recorded 1
Lucy Thorpe · Head of Policy Mental Health Foundation 1
Malcolm Phillips · Regulatory Policy Manager Advertising Standards Authority 1
Nyome Nicholas-Williams, Model and Activist Not recorded 1
Professor David Sines · Chair Joint Council for Cosmetic Practitioners - The JCCP 1
Professor Heather Widdows · Pro-Vice-Chancellor (Research and Knowledge Transfer) and Professor of Global Ethics University of Birmingham 1
Professor James McVeigh · Professor in Substance Use Epidemiology Manchester Metropolitan University 1
Professor Jean McHale · Professor of Healthcare Law and Director of the Centre for Health Law Science and Policy University of Birmingham 1
Professor Sandeep Ranote · Children's Mental Health Lead Greater Manchester Health and Social Care Partnership 1
Tam Fry · Chairman National Obesity Forum 1
Zoe Seager · Deputy Director, Mental Health Policy and Delivery Department of Health and Social Care 1

Correspondence

1 letter

On smaller screens, scroll horizontally to read every column. Keyboard users can focus the table region and use the arrow keys.